Monday, October 24, 2011

Specific Ethical Question


Blog Post 10: Specific Ethical Question

Ask/address an ethical question in your field of interest.
Develop/address arguments for each side of the issue, then defend your position on the issue.
this activity must include references
each student will then review this beginning on Nov 2.
Evaluation Criteria:

1-4 are evaluated by assigning a strong(S), medium(M) or weak(W)

1. Described field of interest and described question posed.
2. Both sides of argument were presented.
3. Appropriate references were included
4. Defended position is described clearly
5. provide one useful comment

The question: Is it ethical to be genetically modifying the human genome to better human survival (using Gene Therapy in Humans)?
My field of interest is in the Biotechnology field I like exploring how changing/adding one factor changes the next. The idea of using Gene Therapy in humans has always been an interesting topic and there are many expansions for research in this field, but there much controversy on the issue.  The basics of gene therapy are that genes are changed in an individual’s cell or biological tissues by way of inserting, altering or removing the genes. This technique is used in treatment of diseases that are gene related. It is a relatively “new” technique that has much use before it can be used on a large scale-if that happens. The basic idea is that non defective genes are inserted in the genome, existing genes are modified or taking out the defective gene altogether to produce a specific result.
On the pro side the main backing is that it can be used to treat/cure a disease or genetic problem. This can extend the life for the individual or greatly change how they function. Some diseases/genetic disorders that have been used with this technique include: X-CID “Bubble boy syndrome,” cancer, deafness, Huntington’s etc.  If the genes are altered the disorder will essentially be cured in all successive generations.
However there are some cons to this issue as well. When changing the genes of individual can produce undesirable results as in the case of the gene therapy treatment of “Bubble boy” in which the individual actually developed Leukemia. Other cons include high monetary costs and the religious backing on the issue. The procedure of gene therapy is relatively expensive and isn’t affordable to the average family on a regular basis.  Religious is basically saying that we were put on this earth to have these genes and we shouldn’t be messing with the blue prints.
My position on the ethical question of Gene therapy isn’t necessarily 100% for or against it. I believe it could be very useful in the future for practical use against disease therapy and cures. However, further studies need to be done to examine the success of the process. Also I see where the religious backing would discourage changing our genes that were passed down to us-it’s basically changing who we are as a person. But if we weren’t meant to change our genetic code, why give us the ability to learn the techniques?


http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/medicine/genetherapy.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_therapy
http://www.ndsu.edu/pubweb/~mcclean/plsc431/students98/fleck.htm

17 comments:

  1. 1. Described field of interest and described question posed. Strong
    2. Both sides of argument were presented. Strong
    3. Appropriate references were included. Strong
    4. Defended position is described clearly. Acceptable

    5. provide one useful comment
    It's human nature to want to tinker with things. I ask, what is the limit we should go to? You don't seem to answer that one. How much are you in favor of gene therapy?

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1. S
    2. S
    3. S
    4. M

    5. I think your last statement is a little weak. I understand where it's coming from but I would ask the question if we weren't meant to murder people why were we given the ability? I think you did a nice job on this post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1.S
    2.S
    3.M
    4.S

    5. Maybe take a stronger stance on the issue or explain more reasons for why your aren't certain about gene therapy. Otherwise good information on the pros and cons of gene therapy as well as how it relates to you field of interest.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 1.S
    2.S
    3.S
    4.M
    5.Your explanation of your position is lacking. I would suggest picking a side instead of saying that you aren't 100% for or against it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 1. S
    2. S
    3. S
    4. M

    5. Overall, I think you had a really good topic and discussion of genetic manipulation. In your argument for or against you stated that you really wern't sure. I think that is a fine that you don't know, but maybe explain why you are unsure on the topic.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 1. S
    2. M
    3. S
    4. S
    5. I enjoyed reading your argument however i felt as though your pros could have been expanded on giving more reasons as to why genetic manipulation is good.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 1.S
    2.M
    3.S
    4.S
    5. I think your arguments for the pros could have been expanded on; made a little more specific. But very good overall.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 1.S
    2.M
    3.S
    4.M

    I liked reading about this Amy, very well done. I think that if you expanded a bit more on your position of you why you are uncertain about gene therapy would make this stronger.

    ReplyDelete
  9. 1. Described field of interest and described question posed. S
    2. Both sides of argument were presented. S
    3. Appropriate references were included S
    4. Defended position is described clearly S

    5. I also think that it would be up to the person specifically if it was ethical based on their situation. I think you covered both sides very well, the pros and cons of each pro and con. I think I am against it for myself, but it is great for those who are dying, and it saves their life.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 1. S
    2. S
    3. S
    4. W

    5. You didn't really take a side on the argument. One of the key points of this exercise was to get you to take a firm stance and defend your position. That being said, it is certainly a tough topic to take a definitive stance on

    ReplyDelete
  11. 1. S
    2. S
    3. S
    4. M
    5. I like how you answered your position; being not 100% for or against. Just expand more on why you feel that way.

    ReplyDelete
  12. 1.s
    2.s
    3.s
    4.m

    your reasoning for your position could work for either argument.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 1.S
    2.M
    3.S
    4.M

    5.Your reasoning on your position could be developed more.

    ReplyDelete
  14. 1. S
    2. M
    3. S
    4. M
    Some more pro arguments would be great, maybe a few examples…

    ReplyDelete
  15. 1.S
    2.S
    3.S
    4.M

    Could have defended your opinion a bit more.

    ReplyDelete
  16. 1. S
    2. M
    3. S
    4. M
    5. Your position could have been explained better.

    ReplyDelete
  17. 1. S
    2. M
    3. M
    4. M

    You provided an argument for both sides, however they were rather hard to follow. You position could use more on why you feel the way you do.

    ReplyDelete